Face it the PS3 is a joke.
the cellprocessor is a joke too, its so powerful that it makes me laugh.
Ps3 one the other hand has delayed games or games that are for 360 also. Without exclusive games it will fail miserably.
i'd prefer games that were delayed than games that were released very early but with "tons of bugs and crappiness" and dont forget that ps3 has just been released, lets say 2/3 months ago, so why do you allready critisize it for the lack of exclusiveness? MGS4 isnt even released yet,
1.im not a sonyfanboy, cause ive owned products from sony's competitors
Thats just dumb
I agree with Evil_Muska. Every time you post something about Sony. you are always praising it and bashing Nintendo.
i allready explained that i wasnt bashing anything,
1. You don't have to have only owned Playstation products to be a fanboy.
2. Really? I need to read it more carefully? You don't have to directly say something to be SAYING it.
1.i dont think your a fanboy of playstation if you bought products of playstation's competitor, i do think that people can be honest about other products they "allready tried" and critisize it, and i dont think people should call someone a fanboy just because they critisize something they allready tried, the one's that are the actual fanboys are the one's that cant stand the person critisizing the product that he loves.
You start off by saying...
"or if you prefer something much easier than go for... MARIOKART"
I don't know if you've noticed, but all of us have the brain capacity to choose what game we want to play.
Basically, this portion of the post is irrelevent to the rest other than to suggest that if your not skilled enough you should settle to something on your "level"
, insinuating that Mario Kart is for the unskilled, which is far from the truth (if you've ever played a Mario Kart game, you would know this).
thats true, mario kart is more easier so what i mean is, if you dont want to gain skills for a particular game you could just play mariokart wich is very easy to play and no training/pro skills are required.
^please dont jump to any conclusions next time^
you then go on to display a picture from a Mario Kart game, which is again irrelivant other than to poke at it's cartoony art style.... we don't need to be shown what Mario Kart looks like, everyone has already seen it, so it's obviously there to mock the game.
again you jump to conclusions really fast,
yes i did put a picture of mariokart in the post, but that doesnt mean im mocking mariokart, i could also have liked the image and style of mario kart, and maybe the reason i posted in the post is because i wanted to show to evryone that game designs/turns are indeed easy/simple....
Finally, you place one of these --->
right below the pic (what? did you think I wouldn't notice?).
This is the clearest sign that you are, in fact, making fun of the game.
has different meanings, it could indeed be used to make fun of something, it could also be used to laugh at something you think is funny... or fun...
how would you know i used
to make fun of the game?
oh wait... cause deep inside you think that mariokart will always look bad if you post an image of mariokart under a different race game right?
If Ferarris were the same price as say, a Jetta, a majority of people would get either a VW Jetta,
well if you have knowledge of cars you would choose ferrari over a Jetta,
but if you dont know wich one is better and if you dont even know what the differences are, than yes there will be a big chance you would choose a Jetta over a Ferrari.
but dont forget that there are people that prefer fun over quality:
I believe the Wii would sell if it was the price of a ps3. The reason being, it has the fun factor.
and i dont think those people would choose a ferrari, or a Jetta, they would choose something like:
i think those people who prefer fun over quality would like to drive this duck car with 1 remote controller that can move 360 degrees of both Y and X axes, that is very revolutionary... and dont forget "fun