Damm

better radar yay.
i think 12 max could be a bit boring in bc (unless the maps are really small) and the popular servers would be full pretty fast, leaving crappy servers only (we dont have that many atm anyway). imo obj definately should be 20 max like it is now (less than 14 would feel like playing a match on public servers as well), but bc should also have 20-28 slots (depending on the map size)

I agree with snake. 12 players should probably be the official competition settings, but the standard objective should at least reach 14 or even 16. Not sure if 20 is such a great idea since some servers cant even handle that many players without massively screwing up with lag and bugs. Currently the only server that is friendly to usa as eu players is Heros server... everything else has massive lag spikes and is friendly to 1 side eu or usa. But definitely bc should decrease down to a manageable size. Currently it is 36 ( or 34? ) but that is too much and causes too much problems with server connection imo. ( remembering MASSA, and AK47 servers..) Then again if you are allowing custom configs on servers and a server host wants to host 64 players they he should have the ability to do so, kinda like on .48. 12 Sounds like a great number for competition level settings, if the game receives that much attention to even have 6 v 6 tournaments.

Speaking of Single Fire mode I requested this option before, and would like to see it done easier in CQB. Currently in TC:E you have to keep changing fire mode to set to what you want it to be during the matchup. IF its possible to add in Options > Game > Fire Mode: Single, Auto, Burst selection then please do so. Its tedious to keep clicking G every time the game stats to change what you want to use.

You guys are talking about current TCE servers. You have to keep in account that perhaps not all will switch over to CQB and that there will possibly be newer servers with a hopefully newer player base.

less recoil..

okay i never played .48 online just tested and never saw anything big so didnt notice

i have to disagree in this one

i like 12 playe limit is good choice but indeed if someone wants to create unoffical server let them tune up the limit i would like to see large cqb maps with very good use of obstacles that can be penetrated and server with only few people runing around

btw im not competitive player

what!? you never played 0.48 online? i think ive played with you redrum, arent you that guy from newyork?

Wrong RedRum that was a different guy. But you guys are getting off topic. Stick to suggestions or questions about CQB.... Pm each other if u wanna meet for lunch :S

Lolwut yea

But when you kiddies played with your elite i was on true combat 1.2

I have my location visible
Besides im third redrum on the forums thats what dianne and others said on my first thread

The reason why single fire was more effective in 0.48 was that the damage was reduced increasingly for successive bullets in bursts/full auto, i.e., a three round burst had only the summed damage of something like 2.25 bullets (1 + 0,75 + 0,5). That made semi auto more effective and powerful. With more elaborated simulation of recoil, this balancing method was removed.

I agree that the marksman ability could raise the power of the first shot and reduce the power of the succesive shots similar to the method employed in 0.48, combined with recoil/accuracy adjustments.

I'm not sure if this has been asked or answered yet, so forgive me if it has, but i am wondering as i am a mac user, will CQB be available on the same systems as TC:E?

Thanks,

Coroner Wrote:

No comments for the bleeding thing?